The Bible tells one story. Humanity growing up.
View the Project on GitHub trusthumankind/christianity-in-24-hours
Q: Why does God allow suffering?
A: Pain gives the test meaning and makes the mission real.
This is the question that breaks people. Not doubt about theology or confusion about doctrine — suffering. A child dies of cancer. An earthquake buries a city. A person lives a faithful life and gets repaid with tragedy. And someone says, “God has a plan.”
No. Stop saying that.
“God has a plan” is the most destructive sentence in Christianity — not because it’s theologically wrong (though it is), but because it’s cruel. Telling a parent who just buried their child that God planned this is not comfort. It’s violence dressed as theology.
So let’s be honest about suffering, even when honesty is harder than a platitude.
If God is all-powerful and all-good, why does suffering exist? This is the Problem of Evil, and philosophers and theologians have wrestled with it for millennia. The standard answers go something like this:
Each has a kernel of truth and a mountain of problems.
“Suffering tests faith” makes God a sadist who gives a child leukemia to see whether her parents will still pray.
“Suffering is the consequence of sin” doesn’t explain the tsunami that kills 230,000 people regardless of their moral character.
“God has a greater plan” is unfalsifiable — it explains everything and therefore nothing.
“Satan causes suffering” raises a deeper problem: if Satan is the source of suffering, that challenges whether God can be trusted to triumph over evil at all. And in Job, Satan doesn’t act independently — he acts with God’s explicit permission, which puts the problem right back on God’s desk.
Here is what the first sixteen hours give us instead: God built a world with real consequences and real freedom, then stepped back. Suffering is not inflicted. It is not curated. It is not directed at specific people for specific reasons. It is what happens when a world runs on its own laws — physical laws, biological laws, and the consequences of free will.
Jesus suffered. That matters.
He wasn’t shielded from hunger, exhaustion, grief, or fear. He wept when Lazarus died (John 11:35). He felt abandoned in Gethsemane. He cried out on the cross: “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” (Matthew 27:46).
If Jesus — the person who carried the mission most faithfully — wasn’t spared suffering, then suffering is not a sign that you’ve done something wrong. It’s not God correcting you. It’s not a consequence of insufficient faith. It’s the terrain.
The mission has always been carried through suffering, not around it. Abraham left everything familiar. Moses wandered for forty years. The prophets were mocked, imprisoned, killed. Jesus went to the cross. The early church was hunted. Faithfulness has never come with a guarantee of comfort.
Suffering is not the opposite of the mission. Suffering is where the mission gets tested. Anyone can choose love, generosity, and justice when it costs nothing. The test only means something when it costs everything — and you choose the mission anyway.
Suffering is not punishment. If it were, the most faithful people would suffer least. They don’t. The biblical pattern runs the other way — the more faithfully someone carries the mission, the more they tend to suffer. Jesus, the prophets, the early church. Suffering as punishment is misguided theology, however well-meaning the person who says, “Maybe God is trying to teach you something.”
Suffering is not a test administered by God. God is not giving you cancer to see how you handle it. God stepped back. The world runs on its own laws. Cells mutate. Tectonic plates shift. People make choices that harm other people. These are not divine interventions — they are the mechanics of a world that operates on its own terms.
Suffering is not “God’s plan.” This is the platitude that needs to die. When a child is born with a terminal illness, God did not plan that. When a genocide wipes out a people, God did not orchestrate it for a greater good. To claim God planned these things is to make God the author of the very evil the mission exists to overcome.
Suffering does not always have a reason. Sometimes a hurricane destroys a city because warm water and atmospheric pressure produce hurricanes. Sometimes a good person gets sick because biology doesn’t check your moral record. The insistence that every instance of suffering must have a divine reason behind it is not faith — it’s the refusal to sit with uncertainty. And sitting with uncertainty is one of the hardest parts of faith.
Suffering doesn’t have a reason. But it can have a response.
When you suffer — and you will — you face a choice. The same choice Jesus faced in Gethsemane. Do you walk away from the mission, or do you carry it through the pain?
Suffering can forge honesty. The pretense that everything is fine collapses when the floor drops out. You discover what you actually believe, as opposed to what you’ve been saying you believe. David’s rawest psalms — the ones where he accuses God of hiding, of forgetting, of sleeping (Psalm 13, Psalm 22, Psalm 44) — are the most honest prayers in Scripture. They’re also the ones Jesus quoted from the cross.
Suffering can build compassion. Paul wrote:
“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our affliction, so that we may be able to comfort those who are in any affliction, with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God.” — 2 Corinthians 1:3-4 ESV
The person who has suffered knows what suffering feels like. That knowledge — not theological expertise, not advice, not platitudes — is what actually helps someone who is hurting.
Suffering can clarify priorities. You find out what matters when what doesn’t matter gets stripped away. Health. Relationships. Purpose. The promotion, the house, the retirement portfolio — they recede. What remains is what was always real.
None of this makes suffering good. Suffering is not a gift. It is not a blessing in disguise. It is not something to be grateful for. It’s damage. But the response to damage is where character is built — and character is what the mission requires.
None of those responses address the hardest case: the suffering of the innocent. A child who has made no choices. An infant born into famine. A person with severe disabilities who never had the chance to carry the mission at all.
There is no theological answer that makes this okay. Any framework that claims to fully explain the suffering of the innocent is lying to you.
What can be said is this: the suffering of the innocent is not God’s will, God’s plan, or God’s tool. It is the cost of a world that runs on its own laws. And the mission — the whole mission — is partly about building a world where that suffering is reduced. Every medical breakthrough, every act of care for the vulnerable, every system built to protect the powerless is humanity doing exactly what we were put here to do.
You will encounter suffering you cannot explain. When you do, resist the urge to explain it. Sit with the people who are hurting. Do the practical work of reducing the damage. And carry the mission forward — not because suffering makes sense, but because the response to suffering is where the mission becomes real.
← Hour 16: Giving · Table of Contents · Hour 18: Forgiveness →